1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 DAVID DADON, ) No. CV 19-5023-JVW (AGR) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 v. ) ) 14 RONALD D. SUGAR, et al., ) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action on June 10, 2019. Pursuant to this Court’s 18 Order dated July 10, 2019, Plaintiff was advised that, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 4(m), service of the summons and complaint must be accomplished on each named 20 defendant within 90 days after filing the complaint, and that the 90-day period would expire 21 on October 8, 2019. The Court’s Order expressly warned Plaintiff that “Non-compliance 22 with this paragraph may result in issuance of an order to show cause re dismissal for failure 23 to prosecute.” 24 To date, no proofs of service have been filed and therefore it appears that no named 25 defendants have been served. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules 26 of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 41-1, 27 IT IS ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff shall 28 why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. □□ □□□□□□□□□ 2|| does not timely file such a declaration or if plaintiff fails to show good cause for failure to timely serve, the Court will recommend that the action be dismissed 4| without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to prosecute or for failure to serve process. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); Local Rule 41-1; Link v. Wabash R.R.,

, 82 6| S.Ct. 1386,

(1962). Service of the complaint upon each named defendant 7| shall be deemed compliance with this Order to Show Cause. 8 9 Whee A Keenbag, 10 | DATED: November 1, 2019 ~_ ALICIAG. ROSENBERG 4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28