Lo v. City of Santa Clara
Lo v. City of Santa Clara
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 il LAWRENCE LO, et al., Case No. 18-cv-03153-NC
Plaintifts, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL y DISMISSAL 13 , 14 || CITY OF SANTA CLARA, etal. Defendants. 15
A 16
5 17 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action (see Dkt. No. 75),
18 || and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY 19 |} ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with 20 || prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party 21 || may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 60 days. All 22 || scheduled dates are VACATED. 23 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 60 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 24 || Life Ins. Co. of Am.,
511 U.S. 375, 381(1994). 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: September 30, 2019 _ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 28 United States Magistrate Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown