Soman v. Alameda Health System

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JAS SOMAN, Case No. 17-cv-06076-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE RECONSIDERATION AND 9 Vv. RE-OPENING CASE 10 ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM, ll Defendant.

13 In light of a Ninth Circuit opinion published after the Court dismissed this case, the Court || advised the parties and the circuit that it would favorably view a motion for reconsideration by 15 plaintiff. Dkt. No. 66. The circuit remanded the case on that basis, Dkt. No. 68, and the Court a 16 || now grants reconsideration. The FCRA practices found to be impermissible in Gilberg v. 17 California Check Cashing Stores, LLC, 913 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir. 2019), are substantively identical || to the ones Soman challenges here. Gilberg leaves no doubt that the second amended complaint || states a plausible claim.

20 The orders dismissing Soman’s second amended complaint and entering judgment against 21 her, Dkt. Nos. 49 and 50, are vacated. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended || Complaint, Dkt. No. 44, is denied. The case is restored to active status. A scheduling conference || is set for January 9, 2020.

24 IT IS SO ORDERED.

25 Dated: October 18, 2019 28 JAMES/PONATO- United Ztates District Judge