1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 KELVIN BRIDGES, Case No. 18-cv-05764-RMI

9 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE 10 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

11 ANDREW M. SAUL, 12 Defendant.

13 14 This Social Security appeal was filed on September 20, 2018. (Dkt. 1). Pursuant to the 15 Court’s Scheduling Order, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was due on March 7, 2019. 16 (Dkt. 2). Plaintiff’s motion has not yet been filed. 17 On October 7, 2019, the court entered an Order to Show Cause regarding Dismissal. (Dkt. 18 19). The court therefore ordered Plaintiff to show cause, no later than November 7, 2019, why this 19 appeal should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Id. The deadline for 20 Plaintiff to respond to the court’s Order to Show Cause passed without a response from Plaintiff. 21 “In determining whether to dismiss an action for lack of prosecution, the district court is 22 required to weigh several factors: ‘(1) the public's interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; 23 (2) the court's need to manage its docket; (3) the risk of prejudice to the defendants; (4) the public 24 policy favoring disposition of cases on their merits and (5) the availability of less drastic 25 sanctions.’” Carey v. King,

(9th Cir. 1988) (quoting Henderson v. Duncan, 26

(9th Cir. 1986)). 27 In this instance, Plaintiff’s abandonment of his case controls the five factors set forth in 1 to litigate this case makes it impossible for the court to proceed. The court’s need to manage its 2 || docket, the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation, and the risk of prejudice to 3 || Defendant all weigh in favor of dismissal. The court has waited approximately eight months for 4 || Plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment, yet he has not done so and has not 5 |} communicated with the court. There are no less drastic alternatives available. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice for 7 || failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: November 8, 2019 10 11 ROBERT M. ILLMAN 12 United States Magistrate Judge

15 16

it

4 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28