1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 XIAODAN ZHU, Case No. 19-cv-08028-SI 8 Plaintiff, 9 y. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 1 10 GARY GE, et al., 11 Defendants.

5 13 On December 9, 2019, pro se plaintiff Xiaodan Zhu filed the above captioned action. DKt. S 14 |] No.1. Plaintiffs complaint alleges this court has diversity jurisdiction because none of the plaintiffs 3 15 || live in the same state as any of the defendants and the amount of damages is more than $75,000. a 16 || Dkt. No.

. However, the caption of the complaint lists: (1) the plaintiff's address as 5941 3 17 || California St., San Francisco, (2) defendant Gary Ge’s address as 1992 Bowers Ave. Santa Clara, 18 || California; and (3) defendant Yushan Duan’s phone number as a 408 area code — which is associated 19 || with San Jose, California. As such, it does not appear that this Court has diversity jurisdiction. 20 Accordingly, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing why this action 21 || should not be dismissed for lack of federal jurisdiction, by filing a brief on or before January 22 || 10,2020 concerning diversity jurisdiction. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: December 12, 2019 Site WU tee 26 SUSAN ILLSTON 27 United States District Judge 28