Mavungo v. Sessions

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 THOMAS MAVUNGO, Case No.: 19cv1431-LAB (JLB) 12 Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING 13 v. NOTIFICATION OF PETITIONER’S ATTORNEY 14 JEFFERSON SESSIONS III, 15 Respondent.

18 Petitioner Thomas Mavungo (also identified as Thomas Mavungu or Mavungo Thomas) filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, asking that he be granted asylum and that his order of removal not be carried out. He has apparently already sought removal by a petition for review, unsuccessfully.

23 This Court has no jurisdiction to review final orders of removal under § 2241.

24 See Puri v. Gonzales, 464 F.3d 1038, 1041 (9th Cir. 2006); Alvarez-Barajas v. Gonzales, 418 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir. 2005). Federal jurisdiction is presumed to be lacking, Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994), and the party invoking the Court’s jurisdiction must establish it. See Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S.Ct. 1540, 1547 (2016).The Court therefore ordered Mr. Mavungo ||to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The Court instructed him to address jurisdiction, not the merits of his asylum claim.

3 Mavungo has now filed his response, which addresses only the merits of his ||claim. He asks that someone come visit him to discuss his case. The response ||identifies Mavungo’s attorney or former attorney as Luis Macias. The Clerk is || directed to forward a copy of this order and of Mr. Mavungo’s most recent response 7 Mr. Macias at the physical and email addresses provided in his state bar profile.

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

10 ||Dated: September 10, 2019 11 ( iM 4. JB wy 12 Hon. Lafry Alan Burns 43 Chief United States District Judge