United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2019

Ewing v. LeadExcel, Inc

Ewing v. LeadExcel, Inc
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided December 10, 2019
Ewing v. LeadExcel, Inc

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ANTON EWING, Case No.: 18cv2845-LAB (JLB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER STAYING CASE 13 v. 14 LEADEXCEL, INC., et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Anton Ewing filed a notice that Defendant Ron Taylor has filed a bankruptcy petition. Although LeadExcel does not appear to be named as a debtor, Taylor is a principal of the company, and appears to be the only person who could act on its behalf. Taylor and LeadExcel are the only two remaining Defendants in the case.

22 The Court has the inherent power to manage its docket, which includes the power to stay proceedings. Good v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 5 F. Supp. 2d 804, 806 (N.D. Cal. 1998) (citing Landis v. Am. Water Works & Elec. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254–55 (1936)). For reasons discussed in its earlier order staying the case (Docket no. 22), the Court concludes that the entire case should be stayed.

27 This case is STAYED pending the outcome of Taylor’s bankruptcy proceedings. Ewing is ORDERED to monitor the docket in the bankruptcy case, 1 to file a notice notifying the Court within 60 days of the date that case || concludes.

4 IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 || Dated: December 10, 2019 laud A 7 Hon. Larry Alan Burns 8 Chief United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.