(PC) Lamon v. Allison

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BARRY LOUIS LAMON, No. 2:18-cv-2218 TLN CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On October 31, 2019, the district court judge assigned to this case ordered that plaintiff “comply with the September 30, 2019 order (ECF No. 20) and file a second amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order.” Plaintiff was warned that “[f]ailure to file a second amended complaint in accordance with the September 30, 2019 order may result in dismissal of this action.” Plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint.

22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to follow court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time | waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. | 1991).

3 || Dated: January 29, 2020 ff Pee a4 / / ) i /- it LE ee 7 4 CAROLYN K. DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8] 4 lamo2218.fta