(PC) Harris v. Rendon

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

(PC) Harris v. Rendon

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 | SAMUEL L. HARRIS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00075-EPG (PC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF 9 COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (ECF NO. 9) 10 | A. RENDON, 11 Defendant. 12 13 On February 26, 2020, Plaintiff filed what the Court construes as a notice voluntarily 14 | dismissing this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 | 41(a)\(1)(A)@. (ECF No. 9). Therefore, this action has been terminated.! Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 | 41(a)(1)(A)Q); Wilson v. City of San Jose,

111 F.3d 688, 692

(9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the 17 | Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate all pending motions and deadlines and close this case. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED.

20 Dated: _ February 27, 2020 [sf ey 1 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 | “Unless the notice or stipulation states otherwise, the dismissal is without prejudice. But if the plaintiff previously dismissed any federal- or state-court action based on or including the same claim, a notice of dismissal 28 | operates as an adjudication on the merits.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B).

Reference

Status
Unknown