United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2020

(SS) Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security

(SS) Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided March 25, 2020
(SS) Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA, CSBN 223600 Special Assistant United States Attorney 5 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 6 Telephone: (415) 977-8929 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 ) Case No. 2:19-cv-01350-EFB STACY ANN ROBINSON, ) 14 ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] Plaintiff, ) ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 15 ) vs. ) 16 ) ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) 18 ) Defendant. )

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court’s approval, that all case deadlines shall be extended by three weeks, resulting in the following new schedule: April 17, 2020 Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment due May 17, 2020 Defendant’s Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment due June 7, 2020 Plaintiff’s Opposition and Reply due 1 Defendant’s counsel hereby requests this extension of all case deadlines because she need 2 confer with her client regarding an Appointments Clause issue that Plaintiff has raised unde || Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 138 S. Ct. 2044 (2018). Defendant’s counse || requests three weeks to do so because the Appeals Council’s ability to consider and advise on thi 5 is subject to potential delays since Appeals Council staff are currently working remotely 1 || light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Plaintiff is in agreement with this request for a || extension of time. g Respectfully submitted, || Dated: March 23, 2020 JESSE S. KAPLAN ll By: /s/ Jesse S. Kaplan* JESSE S. KAPLAN 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff B [*As authorized by e-mail on Mar. 23, 2020] Dated: March 24, 2020 McGREGOR W. SCOTT 15 United States Attorney 17 By: /s/ Margaret Branick-Abilla MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA 18 Special Assistant United States Attorney 19 Attorneys for Defendant [PROPOSED] ORDER 22 Pursuant to stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 24, 2020. □□ BG Zitenan | 26 HON. EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Stipulation & [Prepesed] Order Case No. 2:19-cv-01350-EFB

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.