United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2020

(PC) Bontemps v. Narinder

(PC) Bontemps v. Narinder
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided March 30, 2020
(PC) Bontemps v. Narinder

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GREGORY C. BONTEMPS, No. 2:19-cv-2605 TLN CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS NARINDER SAUKHLA, 15 Defendant.

17 By an order filed February 12, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 5. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections //// //// | to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file | objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.

3 | Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4 | Dated: March 30, 2020 f° Lf i, / CAN fu fl. ay CAROLYN K. DELANEY 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE | 13:bont2605.no.fee.f&r

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.