United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2020

Cantu v. Kings County

Cantu v. Kings County
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided April 16, 2020
Cantu v. Kings County

Trial Court Opinion

4 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROGER CANTU, et al., Case No.: 1:20-cv-00538-NONE-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR 10 v. APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM

11 (ECF No. 2) KINGS COUNTY; et al., Defendants.

15 Roger Cantu, Linda Brown, and G.C, a minor, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 16 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 15, 2020. Along with the complaint, a petition was filed seeking to have Maryzol Jones, G.C.’s mother, appointed to act as guardian ad litem in the matter.

18 Pursuant to Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a representative of an incompetent person may sue or defend on the incompetent person’s behalf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c).

20 This requires the Court to take whatever measures it deems appropriate to protect the interests of the individual during the litigation. United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Klickitat Cty., State of Wash., 795 F.2d 796, 805 (9th Cir. 1986). The appointment of the guardian ad litem is more than a mere formality. Id. “A guardian ad litem is authorized to act on behalf of his ward and may make all appropriate decisions in the course of specific litigation.” Id. A guardian ad litem need not possess any special qualifications, but he must “be truly dedicated to the best interests of the person on whose behalf he seeks to litigate.” AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager, 143 F.Supp.3d 27 1042, 9 (E.D. Cal. 2015). This means that the guardian ad litem cannot face an impermissible conflict wOASe LOU UVM YOO INN PAI MIU I Ee OY Oe | Jor previous relationship with the ward. Id. (citations omitted).

2 “[W]hen a parent brings an action on behalf of a child, and it is evident that the interests o | }each are the same, no need exists for someone other than the parent to represent the child’s interest | |under Rule 17(c).” Gonzalez v. Reno, 86 F.Supp.2d 1167, 1185 (S.D. Fla.), aff'd sub nom. Gonzale: ||v. Reno, 212 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2000). While a parent is generally appointed as a guardian a | |litem, there are situations where the best interests of the minor and the interests of the parent conflict |{Anthem Life Ins. Co. v. Olguin, No. 1:06-CV-01165 AWINEW, 2007 WL 1390672, at *2 (E.D. Cal ||May 9, 2007). Therefore, a parent is not entitled as a matter of right to act as guardian ad litem fo ||the child. Id., at *2.

10 The Court has considered the petition of Maryzol Jones for appointment as guardian ad liten + 11 ||for G.C. who is a minor plaintiff in this action and finds no conflict that would preclude her servin; |/as a guardian ad litem for G.C. The Court finds that the appointment is both necessary □□□ | |appropriate. = 14 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Maryzol Jones is appointed as Guardian Ac ||Litem for G.C. > ua 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le ||Dated: _April 16, 2020_ ef 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.