United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2020

(HC) Acuna v. Matteson

(HC) Acuna v. Matteson
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided April 15, 2020
(HC) Acuna v. Matteson

Trial Court Opinion

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JULIANO VITO ACUNA, Case No. 20-cv-01902-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF TRANSFER v. 10 G. MATTESON, Defendant.

12 Petitioner, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition challenges the validity of his conviction from Tehama County Superior Court.

15 A petition for a writ of habeas corpus made by a person in custody under the judgment and sentence of a state court of a state which contains two or more federal judicial districts may be filed in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

18 Each of such districts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to entertain the petition; however, the district court for the district where the petition is filed may transfer the petition to the other district in the furtherance of justice. See id. Federal courts in California traditionally have chosen to hear petitions challenging a conviction or sentence in the district of conviction. See Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 768 (N.D. Cal. 1993); Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968).

24 As Petitioner challenges the validity of his conviction, the proper venue for his petition is the district in which he was convicted. Tehama County is located within the venue of the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 84.

27 Accordingly, in the interest of justice, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States 4.40 UV LI WY MVVULEICEEIL Sr PHM Vern ly Payee ecviv application to proceed in forma pauperis is deferred to the Eastern District. The Clerk shall terminate this motion from this Court’s docket (docket number 2), and shall transfer this matter forthwith.

4 IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 |} Dated: April 15, 2020 4 ne g ACQUELINE SCOTT CORLE United States Magistrate Judge

Q 16 = 17 Z 18 4.40 UV LI WY MVVULEICEEIL Sr PHM Vern ly Payee vviv 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JULIANO VITO ACUNA, 7 Case No. 20-cv-01902-JSC Plaintiff, 9 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 10 G. MATTESON, Defendant.

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California.

That on April 15, 2020, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(es) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Z 18 19 Juliano Vito Acuna ID: AM7465 CSP-Solano || P.O. Box 4000 Vacaville, CA 95696-4000 23 Dated: April 15, 2020 Susan Y. Soong 25 Clerk, United States Djstrict Court 27 By: Ada Means, Deputy €lerk to the 28 Honorable JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.