(PC) Callins v. Stainer
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
(PC) Callins v. Stainer
Trial Court Opinion
41.4970 UV VUtTtOL YAALY Lr NY MVVULIICEI Vy PHU Veni corey Payee +ViIs+
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | CARLTON R. CALLINS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00431-DAD-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 13 v. DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 14] J. ESCUTIA, et al., (ECF No. 55) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, Carlton R. Callins, and Defendants Cervantes, Padilla, Lopez, Escutia, Guzman 18 | and Pena, have filed a stipulation to dismiss all claims with prejudice. (ECF No. 45.) Pursuant 19 | to the stipulation, the case has ended and the case is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. 20 | P.41(a)C1); Wilson v. City of San Jose,
111 F.3d 688, 692(9th Cir. 1997). 21 IS SO ORDERED. 22 23| Dated: _ April 28, 2020 [see ey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown