(PC) Brown v. Ram

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEXTER BROWN, No. 2: 20-cv-0154 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS K. RAM, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 By an order filed January 29, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. On February 26, 2020, the undersigned granted plaintiff an extension of time to March 15, 2020, to file his in forma pauperis application.

22 Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders and has not filed the required documents.

23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 25 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written UVM EIT EAINTT IN BRAUN ee OY oe | objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the | objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The | parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to | appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

6 | Dated: April 28, 2020 Fens Arn 8 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Bris4-Bifp