United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2020

(PC) Gibbs v. Shasta County Superior Court

(PC) Gibbs v. Shasta County Superior Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided May 12, 2020
(PC) Gibbs v. Shasta County Superior Court

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT A. GIBBS, No. 2:18-cv-2263 MCE AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER SHASTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., Defendants.

18 Plaintiff proceeds pro se with a civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a denial of his due process rights, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

20 Plaintiff seeks to challenge conditions of his prior confinement in the Shasta County Jail.

21 However, plaintiff has filed a notice of address change indicating that he is no longer incarcerated.1 Therefore, he must therefore complete and submit a non-prisoner application to 1 The inmate locator website operated by the Shasta County Jail indicates that plaintiff is not presently incarcerated in that facility. See https://www.co.shasta.ca.us/index/sheriff/custody The court has also verified that plaintiff is not incarcerated under the authority of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. See http://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov/search.aspx.

See also Fed. R. Evid. 201 (court may take judicial notice of facts that are capable of accurate determination by sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned); see also City of Sausalito v. O’Neill, 386 F.3d 1186, 1224 n.2 (9th Cir. 2004) (“We may take judicial notice of a record of a state agency not subject to reasonable dispute.”).

2.40 UV LYONS Ne MMIC OPI a ese Yt eT | proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided herewith. See e.g. Adler v. Gonzalez, 2015 WL 2 | 4041772, at *1, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85909 (E.D. Cal. July 1, 2015), report and || recommendation adopted, 2015 WL 4668668, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103386 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, || 2015) (payment of fee not required if plaintiff remains indigent after release from prison), and || cases cited therein.

6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. Within thirty (30) days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and || file the attached application to proceed forma pauperis used by non-prisoners in this district; || failure to timely submit the completed application will result in a recommendation that this action | be dismissed without prejudice.

11 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff, together with a copy of this order, a | blank application to proceed forma pauperis used by non-prisoners in this district.

13 || DATED: May 12, 2020 . .

14 Hthren— Llane 15 ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.