United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2020

(PC) Jenkins v. McKay

(PC) Jenkins v. McKay
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided June 22, 2020
(PC) Jenkins v. McKay

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EPHRAIM JENKINS., Case No. 1:20-cv-00118-AWI-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF 13 v. THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE J. MCKAY, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). (Doc. 13.) The rule provides that a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing … a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Once a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999).

23 Because Plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal, and no opposing party has appeared in this case, this action has terminated. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto June 19, 2020 /s/ .

1 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.