Jewell v. Francis III

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Jewell v. Francis III

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

KAREN JEWELL, ) Case No.: 1:18-CV-01460-DAD-JLT 11 ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER CLOSING CASE 12 v. ) ) ( Doc. 32) 13 ) ) 14 W ILLIAM MONCRIEF FRANCIS III, et al., ) ) 15 Defendants. )

16

17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 32) The Federal 18 Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of 19 the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose,

111 F.3d 688, 692

(9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of 20 Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: July 8, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 23 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown