(PC) Coleman v. Newsom
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RALPH COLEMAN, et al., No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff-Intervenor Christopher Lipsey moves to file a previously-submitted exhibit under seal. Because the exhibit contains information identifying class members and is covered by a protective order previously issued in this action (ECF No. 2109), this court finds good cause to grant Lipsey’s motion. See Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006) (showing of good cause required to seal exhibits to non-dispositive motion).
22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. Lipsey’s July 9, 2020 motion to seal (ECF No. 6754) is granted.
24 2. Exhibit L to the declaration of Kate Falkenstien attached to the parties’ Joint Discovery Dispute Statement (ECF No. 6746-13) shall be stricken from the public record.
26 //// //// //// MASE 2 GU UVM OUTING NI VO PO ee OY ove 1 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file under seal: (a) Lipsey’s July 9, 2020 motion | to seal, and (b) Exhibit L to the declaration of Kate Falkenstien attached to the parties’ Joint | Discovery Dispute Statement (ECF No. 6746-13).
4 | Dated: July 16, 2020 7 ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 Di/prisones-civil rights/cole0520.lipsey ex seal
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.