Scottsdale Indemnity Company v. Yamada

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Scottsdale Indemnity Company v. Yamada

Trial Court Opinion

4.140 UV VVUOUL LYAALY LE NY bMVVUPPIOiit Jt Vifledicy Payee +ViIs+ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTTSDALE INDEMNITY No. 1:18-cv-00801-DAD-EPG COMPANY, 12 ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR Plaintiff, DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH 13 PREJUDICE v. 14 (ECF No. 50) 5 JASON M. YAMADA, et al. Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff and Defendants have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with 18 | prejudice. (ECF No. 134). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with 19 | prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose,

111 F.3d 688, 692

(9th Cir. 20 | 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 | Dated: _ July 22, 2020 [Je hey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown