Turner v. C R Bard Incorporated

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MELISSA TURNER, Case No. 2:20-cv-00645-DAD-BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED 13 v. AGAINST COUNSEL BOBBY SAADIAN FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR AND FAILURE C R BARD INCORPORATED, et al., TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS 15 Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 On March 26, 2020, this case was transferred to this Court from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. (Doc. No. 11.) On March 26, 2020, the Clerk of Court issued a notice directing counsel Bobby Saadian to submit a pro hac vice application to practice in this District. (Doc. No. 13.) On April 13, 2020, the Court issued a minute order setting an Initial Scheduling Conference for July 22, 2020 and directing the parties to submit a Joint Scheduling Report one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference. (Doc. No. 23.) The Court further directed the parties to promptly address as appropriate any counsel identified on the docket who have not been terminated and are not admitted to practice before the Court. (Id.) 25 On July 15, 2020, Defendants submitted a unilateral scheduling report in this case. (Doc.

26 No. 32.) According to the scheduling report, counsel for Plaintiff failed to participate in preparing a Joint Scheduling Report. (Id.) On July 22, 2020, counsel for Plaintiff failed to appear at the Initial Scheduling Conference. Additionally, a review of the docket and Court records indicates that Mr. Saadian has not sought admission to practice before this Court.

3 Pursuant to Local Rule 110, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . .

5 within the inherent power of the Court.” L.R. 110. “District courts have inherent power to control their dockets,” and in exercising that power, a court may impose sanctions, including dismissal of an action.” Thompson v. Housing Authority of Los Angeles, 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir. 1986).

8 A court may dismiss an action with prejudice based on a party’s failure to prosecute an action or failure to obey a court order, or failure to comply with local rules. See, e.g., Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (dismissal for failure to comply with an order); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987) (dismissal for failure to comply with a court order); Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986) (dismissal for failure to prosecute and to comply with local rules).

14 Local Rule 180 further governs admission of attorneys to practice before this Court.

15 “Admission to and continuing membership in the Bar of this Court are limited to attorneys who are active members in good standing of the State Bar of California.” L.R. 180(a). Each applicant for admission must present to the Clerk a Petition by Attorney for Admission to Practice before the Eastern District which complies with the requirements of Local Rule 180(a).

19 Attorneys who are not active members in good standing of the State Bar of California may, upon application and in the discretion of the Court, be permitted to appear and participate in a particular case pro hac vice. Id. at 180(b)(2).

22 Accordingly, Bobby Saadian, counsel for Plaintiff Melissa Turner, is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this Court should not impose sanctions for his failure to obey court orders and failure to appear at the July 22, 2020 Status Conference. Mr. Saadian shall file a written response to this Order to Show Cause within fourteen (14) days of service of this order. Mr. Saadian is reminded that he must submit a Petition by Attorney for Admission to Practice before the Eastern District or file an application for admission to practice pro hac vice, action. The Clerk of Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on Bobby Saadian at the offices of Wilshire Law Firm, 3055 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90010.

3 Failure to respond to this order will result in the imposition of sanctions, including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 Dated: July 22, 2020 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE