Jose Trujillo v. Mariscos Costa Azul Incorporated
Trial Court Opinion
□□□ 4.4970 VV VUOUL WAAW MVVULTIOCEI Oo □□□ Viletneav Paye +vrst UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:19-cv-00891-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) | MARISCOS COSTA AZUL OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL INCORPORATED, et al., PROCEDURE Defendants. (ECF No. 33) 15 On July 23, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action without prejudice and | with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action | has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, | 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice and without an award of costs or | attorneys’ fees.
20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□ (a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2 FA.
54 | Dated: _July 24, 2020 2 ee = UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.