(PC) Wilkins v. Barber
Trial Court Opinion
2.4L VV VILVIVIO VV INGVIN MVVULTIGCEI Lr Vilevicy Paye +vrst 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 KEENAN WILKINS, aka NERRAH No. 2:19-cv-1338 KJN P BROWN, Plaintiff, 13 ORDER Vv.
5 DR. CHRISTINE S. BARBER, et al., Defendants.
17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On July 13, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion || to seal medical records. (ECF No. 97.) Plaintiff argues that the medical records appended to the | June 9, 2020 declaration are confidential and thus there is a compelling reason to seal them, citing | Chester v. King, 2019 WL 5420213 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2019), and Kamakana v. City and County | of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). CECF No. 97.)
22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of | this order, counsel for defendant Mansour shall file a response to plaintiff's motion to seal (ECF | No. 97).
25 Dated: July 29, 2020 26 Al Norra 27 KENDALL J. Wha pwilk1338.mts UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.