Osegueda v. Stanislaus County Public Safety Center

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARMANDO OSEGUEDA, et al., Case No. 1:16-cv-01218-NONE-BAM 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR ON SEPTEMBER 9 v. 10, 2020 TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED STANISLAUS COUNTY PUBLIC FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER SAFETY CENTER, et al., Defendants.

13 Plaintiffs Armando Osegueda and Robert Palomino filed this action on August 16, 2016.

14 (Doc. No. 1.) On February 5, 2017, a Second Amended Complaint was filed adding David Lomeli and Jairo Hernandez as Plaintiffs. (Doc. No. 22.) On January 29, 2019, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation to stay this matter pending resolution of the state criminal proceedings against Plaintiffs. (Doc. No. 50.) The Court further directed Plaintiffs to file a written status report every ninety (90) days notifying the Court of the status of the criminal matter. (Id.) 20 On December 27, 2019, after no status reports had been filed, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with an order of the Court. (Doc. No. 53.) Plaintiffs were required to file either a written response or the required status report by January 10, 2020. (Id.) Plaintiffs did not file a written response or status report as required by the Court’s December 27, 2019 order. Accordingly, on January 29, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiffs’ counsel Amber Hope Gordon to personally appear before the Court on February 12, 2020, to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court’s orders. (Doc. No. 56.) Counsel was permitted to comply with the Court’s January 29, 2020 Order to Show Cause by filing the required status report by February 10, 2020. (Id.) 2 On January 29, 2020, Plaintiffs filed the required status report. (Doc. No. 54.) The Court accordingly discharged the Orders to Show Cause issued December 27, 2019, and January 29, 2020. (Doc. No. 60.) However, counsel was reminded of Plaintiffs’ ongoing obligation to file a written status report every ninety (90) days notifying the Court of the status of the criminal matter. (Id.) Counsel was further cautioned that any future failure to comply with an order of the Court will result in the imposition of sanctions. (Id.) 8 On May 4, 2020, after Plaintiffs again failed to file a status report, the Court issued another Order to Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed. (Doc. No. 60.) Plaintiffs were ordered to respond in writing within fourteen (14) days and were permitted to comply with the Order to Show Cause by filing the required status report. (Id.) On May 22, 2020, Plaintiffs filed the required status report. (Doc. No. 61.) The Court accordingly discharged the Order to Show Cause issued May 4, 2020. (Doc. No. 62.) However, the Court noted that Plaintiffs’ May 22, 2020 status report was filed well after the deadline for a response to the Order to Show Cause.

15 (Id.) Counsel was again reminded of the obligation to file status reports every ninety (90) days and was additionally warned that future failures to comply with the Court’s orders would result in the imposition of sanctions. (Id.) 18 More than ninety days has elapsed since the last submission of a status report on May 22, 2020, and Plaintiffs have once again failed to file a timely written status report.

20 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to control its docket and may impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal of the action.

24 Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000).

25 Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ counsel, Amber Hope Gordon, is HEREBY ORDERED to appear before the undersigned on Thursday September 10, 2020, at 10:00 AM to show cause why sanctions, including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of this action, should not be imposed against her for failure to comply with an order of the Court. In light of the coronavirus (COVID- 19) outbreak and the evolving coronavirus protocols, Ms. Gordon shall appear remotely via Zoom. Ms. Gordon shall contact Courtroom Deputy, Esther Valdez, at (559) 499-5788 or [email protected] for the video and dial-in information.

4 Failure to appear before the Court on September 10, 2020, will result in the imposition of sanctions, including monetary sanctions and/or a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court’s orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 Dated: August 26, 2020 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE