(PC) Carroll v. Covello

MASE 2 OVUM EEUU OING REMUS ee AY tv 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA | T. CARROLL, No. 2:20-cv-1707 KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 V. ORDER | WARDEN COVELLO, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute || right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 | (Oth Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage || of the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases.

21 | Inthe present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the | appointment of counsel at the present time.

23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s request for appointment of | counsel (ECF No. 5) is denied without prejudice.

25 | Dated: September 15, 2020 26 Aectl Aharon 27 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE || /carrl707.110