Vazquez v. Northbrook Indemnity Company

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Vazquez v. Northbrook Indemnity Company

Trial Court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 FERNANDO A. VAZQUEZ, CASE NO: 1:20-cv-00923-DAD-JLT

12 Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION v. 13 (Doc. 4)

14 NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY COMPANY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice with each side to ebar 18 their own fees and costs. (Doc. 4) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such 19 stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have 20 appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 22), it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” 21 Wilson v. City of San Jose,

111 F.3d 688, 692

(9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is 22 DIRECTED to close this action. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: September 29, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26

27

Reference

Status
Unknown