(PC) Coleman v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT E. COLEMAN, No. 2:19-cv-01811-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants.

18 Plaintiff Robert E. Coleman (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21 On July 29, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

25 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

1 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 29, 2020 (ECF No. 7), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 6 2. Plaintiff’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4) is DENIED and Plaintiff is ordered to pay the entire $400.00 in required fees within thirty days or face dismissal of the case; and 9 3. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction (ECF No. 2) is DENIED.

11 IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 DATED: October 6, 2020