(PS)Trinchitella v. Performance Realty Management, LLC
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RONALD F. TRINCHITELLA, No. 2:15-cv-2365-KJM-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AMERICAN REALITY PARTNERS, LLC, et al., Defendants.
18 Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment was submitted for decision without oral argument by the magistrate judge on March 13, 2020. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
21 On September 14, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court ///// ....). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be || supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed September 14, 2020, are adopted in full.
5 2. Plaintiffs motion for default judgment against American Housing Income Trust., Inc. || (ECF No. 59) is denied.
7 | DATED: October 13, 2020.
10 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.