(PS) Stewart v. Property and Casualty Ins. Co. of Hartford

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA COLLEEN STEWART, No. 2:17–cv–2418–TLN–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. OF HARTFORD, Defendant.

17 On June 19, 2020, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 61.)

18 Plaintiff failed to respond or submit her own motion by the deadline, and so the court vacated the hearing. See Local Rule 230 (“Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the [] hearing date . . . No party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.”) (citing L.R. 135). Rather than construe plaintiff’s failure to respond as non-opposition, the court set an additional deadline for plaintiff to respond. (See L.R. 230(c) (“A failure to file a timely opposition may also be construed by the Court as a non-opposition to the motion.”) Plaintiff then requested an extension of time to submit her motion, and the court granted an additional month. (ECF No. 64.) After plaintiff’s submission and defendant’s reply, the court ordered the matter taken under submission without a hearing. (Id.); see also L.R. 230(c), (g).

1 Pursuant to that order, the court received plaintiff's opposition (ECF No. 69), defendant’s | reply (ECF No. 71), plaintiff's declaration (ECF No. 72), defendant’s objections (ECF No. 73), | plaintiff's statement (ECF No. 76), defendant’s objections to this statement (ECF No. 77), and | plaintiffs objections (ECF No. 78). The deadline for submission of documents has now passed, | and the case is under submission. Despite this fact, plaintiff has contacted the courtroom deputy | for this chambers on multiple occasions by email. In these emails, plaintiff appears to be | attempting to submit additional documents concerning her case. The courtroom deputy has | informed plaintiff on multiple occasions that she cannot communicate with the court via email, | but she has persisted in doing so.

10 Plaintiff shall cease contacting the court to submit any documents regarding her case. The | motions are now under submission, and the parties will be contacted if any more information is | required. The parties will be informed of the court’s findings and recommendations after || reviewing all information currently received. Failure to follow this order will result in sanctions, | which may include monetary sanctions including possibly dismissal of plaintiff's case. See Local | Rule 110 (‘Failure [] of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be | grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or || within the inherent power of the Court.”); L.R. 183(a) (“Any individual representing [] herself || without an attorney is bound by the Federal Rules of Civil or Criminal Procedure, these Rules, | and all other applicable law. All obligations placed on “counsel” by these Rules apply to || individuals appearing in propria persona. Failure to comply therewith may be ground for | dismissal, judgment by default, or any other sanction appropriate under these Rules.”); see also | King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987) (“Pro se litigants must follow the same rules of | procedure that govern other litigants”) (overruled on other grounds).

24 | Dated: October 16, 2020 Foci) Aharon 26 KENDALL J. NE stew 2418 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE