(PC) Hodge v. Placer County
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PHILIP WESLEY HODGE, No. 2:20-cv-1531 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PLACER COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff is appearing pro se and in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
18 On, October 19, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court found that this case may proceed against defendant Persinger on a claim arising under the Eighth Amendment for excessive force. With respect to the other defendants identified in plaintiff’s complaint, the court found that the facts alleged fail to state actionable claims. The court gave plaintiff two options: (1) proceed on the claim described above; or 2) make an attempt to cure the deficiencies in his complaint with respect to the other defendants and claims in an amended complaint. Plaintiff elects to procced without amending.
25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. Service of process is appropriate for defendant Persinger.
27 2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff a USM-285 form, summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of plaintiff’s complaint.
1 3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached | Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court: 3 a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents; 4 b. One completed summons; 5 c. One completed USM-285 form; and 6 d. Two copies of the complaint.
7 4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendant Persinger and need not request waiver | of service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States | Marshal to serve defendant Persinger pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without || payment of costs.
11 5. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this | action be dismissed.
13 6. The Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case.
14 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that all claims and defendants other than a claim for | excessive force arising under the Eighth Amendment against defendant Persinger be dismissed.
16 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(). Within fourteen after | being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with | the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and | Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time | waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. | 1991).
23 | Dated: November 9, 2020 bh rdf /f [ { gt 4 CAROLYN K DELANEY 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE | 1 hodg1531.1 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PHILIP WESLEY HODGE, No. 2:20-cv-1531 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION PLACER COUNTY, et al., OF DOCUMENTS 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order filed _____________________: 19 ____ completed summons form 20 ____ completed USM-285 forms 21 ____ copies of the ___________________ Complaint DATED: 25 ____________________ Plaintiff
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.