(PC) Nicholson-Chilton v. Unknown

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JEREMY NICHOLSON-CHILTON, No. 2:20-cv-1624 AC P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS UNKNOWN, 15 Defendant.

17 By an order filed August 18, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to file a complaint and a completed in forma pauperis affidavit, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required documents.

21 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified || time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 | (9th Cir. 1991). .

3 || DATED: December 1, 2020 et, been — {U. te 4 ALLISON CLAIRE ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE