Block v. Pieology Trading Post, LP

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Block v. Pieology Trading Post, LP

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HENDRIK BLOCK, No. 1:20-cv-00956-AWI-SKO

12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 14 PIEOLOGY TRADING POST, LP, et. al, (Doc. 11) 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 On December 1, 2020, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 19 prejudice. (Doc. 11.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 20 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose,

111 F.3d 688, 692

(9th Cir. 1997), and has 21 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Sheila K. Oberto 24 Dated: December 3, 2020 /s/ . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25

26

27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown