Simental v. Ozuna

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Simental v. Ozuna

Trial Court Opinion

sApdardiielnlan@a Wacolunsgo c(SalB.oNrg 2 82026) 2 [email protected] Jordan Wells (SBN 326491) 3 [email protected] ACLU FOUNDATION 4 OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1313 West 8th Street 5 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 977-9500 6 Facsimile: (213) 977-5297

7 Attorneys for Plaintiff

8

9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12

13 PABLO SIMENTAL, JR., an CASE NO: 1:20-cv-00697-NONE-JLT individual, 14 [PROPOSED] ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO 15 Plaintiff, ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE AND v. ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION 16 (Doc. 18)

17 RUBEN OZUNA, in his individual capacity; MICHAEL STRAND, in his 18 individual capacity; GUADALUPE 19 CONTRERAS, in her individual capacity; and CITY of DELANO, 20 Defendants. 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being 3 dismissed with prejudice and with each side to bear their own fees and costs. 4 (Doc. 18) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations 5 effective immediately. Wilson v. City of San Jose,

111 F.3d 688, 692

(9th Cir. 6 1997). Nevertheless, the Court ORDERS: 7 1. Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to assign a district judge to this action 8 and to close this action; 9 2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms and conditions 10 of the Settlement Agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511

11 U.S. 375

(1994). 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13

14 Dated: December 12, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown