(PC) Salas v. Kelso

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALEJANDRO SALAS, No. 2:20-cv-01195-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND J. CLARK KELSO, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this federal civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

20 By order filed November 5, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this matter to a district court judge.

25 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days | after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections | with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff advised that failure to file objections within the specified | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 | (9th Cir. 1991).

6 | Dated: December 16, 2020 Pee a4 if / bas , CANO fe KOU rg CAROLYN K. DELANEY g UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 12/sala1195.fta.docx