Jose Estrada v. Sam Mushmel

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Jose Estrada v. Sam Mushmel

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 19-3377 FMO (KSx) Date January 28, 2020 Title Jose Estrada v. Sam Mushmel, et al.

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions or Dismissal Pursuant to the Court’s Order of July 12, 2019, the parties were required to complete a settlement conference before a mediator from the court’s ADR Panel no later than January 10, 2020. (See Dkt. 29, Court’s Order of July 12, 2019, at 11). If the case settled, the parties were required to file a Notice of Settlement no later than 24 hours after settlement. (See id.). Otherwise, the parties were required to file a Status Report Re: Settlement no later than 48 hours after the settlement conference was complete. (See id.). As of the filing date of this Order, neither a Notice of Settlement nor a Status Report Re: Settlement has been filed. (See, generally, Dkt.). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, no later than February 4, 2020, the parties shall show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court’s Order of July 12, 2019. Failure to submit a response to this Order by the deadline set forth above may result in the imposition of sanctions and/or dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626, 629-30

,

82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388

(1962); Pagtalunan v. Galaza,

291 F.3d 639, 642

(9th Cir. 2002), cert. denied,

538 U.S. 909

(2003). 00 : 00 Initials of Preparer vdr

Reference

Status
Unknown