1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 JARROD GORDON, ) No. EDCV 18-315-RGK (AGR) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ) ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 14 PERRIS POLICE STATION, et al., ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 In this civil rights action, on November 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed a notice of change 18 of address to: Mr. Jarrod Gordon 201943600, P. O. Box 710, Riverside, California 19 92501. (Dkt. No. 91.) 20 On December 2, 2019, the Court received a document from Plaintiff requesting 21 “an update and status” of his case. On December 4, 2019, the Court mailed Plaintiff a 22 copy of the docket to the address provided by Plaintiff. 23 On December 6, 2019, the Court re-mailed Plaintiff the Order re Discovery and 24 Motions that set the discovery and motions deadlines in this case. (Dkt. No. 86.) 25 On December 13, 2019, the court’s mail was returned as undeliverable by the 26 postal service indicating “Return to Sender Not in Custody.” (Dkt. No. 94.) The same 27 28 day, December 13, 2019, the Court re-mailed Plaintiff the Order re Discovery and 2 Motions (Dkt. No. 86) Status Report filed by Defendant Clark (Dkt. No. 89), and a copy 3|| of the docket. 4 On December 16, 20 and 27, 2019, the mail was returned as undeliverable by the postal service indicating “Return to Sender Not in Custody.” (Dkt. Nos. 95, 97-99.) 6 Local Rule 41-6 requires that a Plaintiff proceeding pro se must keep the Court 7| apprised of the Plaintiff's current address. In addition, Local Rule 41-6 provides that “the Court may dismiss the action with or without prejudice for want of prosecution” if 9] the Plaintiff fails to notify the Court in writing of Plaintiff's current address within 15 days after mail is returned as undeliverable by the Postal Service. 11 Plaintiff has failed to notify the court in writing of Plaintiff's current address within 12 15 days after mail is returned as undeliverable as required in Local Rule 41-6. 13 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, on or before February 27, 2020, Plaintiff shall show good cause, if there be any, why this action should not be dismissed without 15 | prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order. Filing a 16 || Notice of Current Address on or before February 27, 2020, shall be deemed 17 || compliance with this Order to Show Cause. 18 If Plaintiff does not timely file a Notice of Current Address on or before 19] February 27, 2020, or otherwise respond to this Order to Show Cause, the court may recommend that the action be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff’s 21| failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order. See Link v. Wabash R.R.,

,

,

(1962). 23 2 fiiei. SA Kean DATED: January 28, 2020 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28