United States District Court for the Central District of California, 2020

Carl R. Bedford, III v. Unknown

Carl R. Bedford, III v. Unknown
United States District Court for the Central District of California · Decided March 4, 2020
Carl R. Bedford, III v. Unknown

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL Case No. _ EDCV 20-336-GW (KS) Date: March 4, 2020 Title Carl R. Bedford, III v. Unknown Present: The Honorable: Karen L. Stevenson, United States Magistrate Judge Gay Roberson N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Proceedings: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL On February 19, 2020, Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff asserts that prison officials assaulted him, causing him serious injury, and that they interfered with his attempts to seek legal redress of the assault. (See id.) However, the handwritten complaint does not clearly identify the cause(s) of action or the relief sought. As such, it violates Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and is subject to dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See FED. R. Cry. P. 8; United States ex rel. Cafasso v. Gen. Dynamics C4 Sys., Inc., 637 F.3d 1047, 1059 (9th Cir. 2011) (complaint violates Rules 8 if a defendant would have difficulty understanding and responding to it); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (Congress requires district courts to dismiss civil rights complaints brought by prisoners if the court determines that the complaint, or any portion thereof, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted).

Also on February 19, 2020, the Court notified Plaintiff that he had failed to pay the filing fee and had not filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. No. 2.) More than two weeks have now passed and Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s notification. Accordingly, because Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor obtained authorization to proceed without prepayment of the fee, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, no later than March 25, 2020, why the action should not be dismissed.

To that end, the Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the Central District’s civil rights complaint form (CV-66) and a copy of the Central District’s form Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support (CV-60P). To discharge this Order and proceed with his case, Plaintiff must either: (1) pay the $400 filing fee in full; or CV-90 (03/15) Civil Minutes — General Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL Case No. _ EDCV 20-336-GW (KS) Date: March 4, 2020 Title Carl R. Bedford, III v. Unknown (2) file the completed forms, and the necessary documentation, with the Court on or before the March 25, 2020 deadline.

Plaintiff's failure to timely comply with this Order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of his case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer CV-90 (03/15) Civil Minutes — General Page 2 of 2

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.