1 2 3 4 5

6 7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ROBERT W. BARROCA, Case No. 2:18-03376 JGB (ADS)

12 Petitioner,

13 v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF 14 JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, et al., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DISMISSING CASE 15 Respondents.

16 17 Pursuant to

, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of 18 Habeas Corpus [Dkt. No. 1], Respondent’s Answer, Petitioner’s Reply, and all the 19 records and related filings herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the 20 assigned United States Magistrate Judge dated May 18, 2020 [Dkt. No. 58], and 21 Petitioner’s Objections to United States Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation [Dkt. 22 No. 61]. 23 The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and 24 Recommendation to which objections have been made and agrees with the Magistrate 1 || Judge’s findings and conclusions, except as to the denial of a certificate of appealability. 2 || A certificate of appealability is not required by a person in federal custody pursuing a 3 || § 2241 petition. See Murth v. Fondren,

(9th Cir. 2012). 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 5 1. The United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [Dkt. 6 No. 58] is accepted; 7 2. The Petition is dismissed with prejudice; and 8 3. Judgment is to be entered accordingly. Z| 10 || DATED: August 21, 2020 Be A THERHONORABLE S505 G. BERNAL 11 Unijefi States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24