Lawrence White v. Stu Sherman

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Lawrence White v. Stu Sherman

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWRENCE WHITE, Case No. CV 20-2518-CJC (PD)

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF 13 v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE 14 JUDGE AND DENYING STU SHERMAN, CERTIFICATE OF 15 Respondent. APPEALABILITY 16

17

18 Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the 19 records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States 20 Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have 21 been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and adopts it as 22 its own findings and conclusions. 23 Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial 24 showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that it erred in its procedural 25 ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. 26 § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322

, 336 27 28 ! | (2003); Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000). Accordingly, the Petition 2 || is dismissed without prejudice. 3 || DATED: October 15, 2020. “| Ls 6 7 CORMAC J. CARNEY 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown