1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH CORNETT, Case No. CV 18-7963-JVS (PD)

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF 13 v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE 14 JUDGE AND DENYING WARDEN PARAMO, CERTIFICATE OF 15 Respondent. APPEALABILITY 16 17

18 Pursuant to

, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the 19 records on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate 20 Judge, and the Supplemental Statement of Decision. Further, the Court has 21 engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner 22 has objected. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and adopts it 23 as its own findings and conclusions. 24 Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the 25 Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial 26 of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. 27 See

(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 28 ! | U.S. 322, 336 (2008); Slack v. McDaniel,

(2000). 2 || Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. 3 [ A f | DATED: December 07, 2020. ew U/ Ihe L$ ff 6 JAMESV.SELNA , UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28