De Well Container Shipping, Inc. v. Sinosharp Imp. and Exp. Co. Ltd.

United States District Court for the Central District of California

De Well Container Shipping, Inc. v. Sinosharp Imp. and Exp. Co. Ltd.

Trial Court Opinion

1 MARRON LAWYERS, APC Paul B. Arenas (SBN 167863) 2 JS-6 [email protected] 3 5000 E. Spring St., Suite 580 Long Beach, CA 90815 4 (562) 432-7422 Telephone 5 (562) 683-2721 Facsimile 6 GKG LAW, P.C. 7 Brendan Collins 1055 Thomas Jefferson St., NW 8 Suite 500 9 Washington, DC 20007 Telephone: (202) 342-6793 10 Facsimile: (202)-342-5299 11 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff, 12 De Well Container Shipping, Inc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 15 16 DE WELL CONTAINER SHIPPING, Case No.: 2:19-cv-08919-RGK-E INC., 17 ORDER REGARDING 18 Plaintiff, STIPULATION OF v. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL [41] 19 20 SINOSHARP IMP AND EXP. Co. Ltd. and WEI SONG, 21 22 Defendant. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 28 1 Pursuant to the Stipulation of all Parties, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 3 1. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)qi), Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed 4 ||with prejudice. 5 2. The 6 |/Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement. Kokkonen □□□ 7 ||\Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Amer.,

511 U.S. 375, 381-82

(1994); Eksouzian v. 8 ||Albanese, No. CV 13-728 PSG (MANX),

2015 WL 12777088

, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Mar. ||2, 2015); and 10 3. Each side shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs in connection with ||the above-captioned case, except insofar as provided by the Settlement Agreement. 12 13. || ITIS SO ORDERED lIDatea: 12/22/2020 xq hastanac 15 on... Gary Klausner 16 United States District Court Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Llaan ATn 9-10 anv, NCOAIO Dk LT

Reference

Status
Unknown