Macias v. Gen San Jose, LP
Macias v. Gen San Jose, LP
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 LENA MACIAS, Case No.19-cv-02355-NC Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL 12 Re: Dkt. No. 22 GEN SAN JOSE, LP, et al., 13 Defendants.
15
Q 16 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that 5 17 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this
18 |} action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 19 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 20 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days. All scheduled dates are 21 || VACATED. 22 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 23 || Life Ins. Co. of Am.,
511 U.S. 375, 381(1994). 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 || Dated: January 8, 2020 hGe<——— —_—> NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 27 United States Magistrate Judge 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown