United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2020

Woo v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

Woo v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Decided February 27, 2020
Woo v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TONY WOO, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07042-MMC 7 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; 8 V. VACATING HEARING 9 AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., Defendant.

12 Before the Court is defendant's Motion to Dismiss, filed January 30, 2020, 13 || whereby defendant, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil © 14 Procedure, seeks dismissal of plaintiffs' initial complaint. On February 13, 2020, plaintiffs Oo || filed a First Amended Complaint.

Q 16 A party may amend a pleading "once as a matter of course within . . . 21 days after Cc @ 17 || service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), || (e), or (f), whichever is earlier." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). "[A]n amended pleading || supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non-existent." Bullen v. De || Bretteville, 239 F.2d 824, 833 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 947 (1957).

21 In the instant case, plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint within 21 days || after service of defendant's motion to dismiss, and, consequently, were entitled to amend || as of right. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1).

24 Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES as moot defendant's motion to dismiss the || initial complaint and VACATES the hearing scheduled for March 6, 2020.

26 IT IS SO ORDERED.

27 Dated: February 27, 2020 : INE M. CHESNEY 28 United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.