1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANDREA WOOD, Case No. 3:19-cv-04202-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 v. 10 ACACIA CHIDI, et al., ll Defendants. 12 ANDREA WOOD, Case No. 3:19-cv-04247-JD 3 Plaintiff,

B15 EDYTH WILLIAMS, et al., 16 Defendants.

= 17 On March 31, 2020, the Court dismissed the complaints in these cases with leave to 18 || amend, and ordered plaintiff to file amended complaints, or otherwise respond, by May 1, 2020. 19 Plaintiff did not do so, and has not otherwise communicated with the Court about her case. The 20 Court has considered the factors in Malone v. United States Postal Service,

(9th 21 Cir. 1987), and find that they do not weigh against dismissal. Consequently, the actions are 22 || dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to follow the 23 || Court’s orders and for lack of prosecution. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: May 15, 2020 26 27 28 JAME NATO. Unite@/States District Judge