Capriole v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Capriole v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOHN CAPRIOLE, et al., Case No. 20-cv-02211-EMC
8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING CASE 9 v. Docket No. 97 10 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 11 Defendants.
12 13 On May 14, 2020, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 14 granted Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration. See Docket No. 96. There being no 15 opposition by either party, the Court DISMISSES the case without prejudice. See Green Tree 16 Fin. Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph,
531 U.S. 79, 87 n.2 (2000). 17 Certification to the Ninth Circuit pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) is not necessary to 18 effectuate appealability of this Court’s order. Unlike the district court in Gonzalez v. Coverall 19 North America Inc., 754 Fed. App’x. 594 (9th Cir. 2019), this Court did not grant the motion to 20 compel arbitration and stay the case, prompting the plaintiffs’ voluntary dismissal. Here, the 21 Court is ordering that the case be dismissed. That order is final and appealable. See Interactive 22 Flight Techs., Inc. v. Swissair Swiss Air Transp. Co.,
249 F.3d 1177, 1179(9th Cir. 2001). 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: May 24, 2020 26 27 ______________________________________
Reference
- Status
- Unknown