United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2020

Johnson v. JKLM Properties, L.L.C.

Johnson v. JKLM Properties, L.L.C.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Decided June 16, 2020
Johnson v. JKLM Properties, L.L.C.

Trial Court Opinion

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION SCOTT JOHNSON, 8 Case No. 5:20-cv-01078-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ Vv. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 10 RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56 JKLM PROPERTIES, LLC, et al., 1] Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendants.

13 Before the Court is Defendant JKLM Properties, LLC’s administrative motion for relief || from General Order No. 56. See Defendant’s Motion for Administrative Relief from General © 15 Order 56 (“Mot.”), Dkt. 15. Plaintiff opposes Defendant’s administrative motion. See Opposition, || MFAR (“Opp,”), Dkt. 16.

17 General Order 56 requires the parties “to engage in a structured process designed to || achieve early compliance with the ADA while minimizing the adversarial litigation process and || concomitant fees.” Cullen v. Netfix, Inc.,2011 WL 13177618, at *1 (N.D. Cal. May 24, 2011) || (quotation marks and citation omitted). The general order imposes an automatic stay on litigation 21 proceedings and only allows a party to file a Rule 12(b) motion, unless the assigned judge orders || otherwise. See N.D. Cal. General Order No. 56.

23 The Court respects the process established by General Order 56 to facilitate and expedite || the cure of ADA violations. However, Defendant argues that this Court lacks subject-matter || jurisdiction over the case and requests leave to file a motion for judgment on the pleadings based || onthe alleged lack of standing. See Mot. at 3. The threshold issue of standing should be resolved Case No.: 5:20-cv-01078-EJD || ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56 as soon as possible. Thus, in the interests of judicial economy and efficiency. the Court GRANTS || Defendant’s administrative motion for relief from General Order 56. Defendant may file a motion || for judgment on the pleadings.

4 IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 Dated: June 16, 2020 EDWARD J. DAVILA 7 United States District Judge 1]

2B

(«17 18 Case No.: 5:20-cv-01078-EJD || ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.