Salcido v. Johnson
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARTIN SEANZ SALCIDO, Case No. 20-cv-01942-YGR (PR) 5 Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AS SUCCESSIVE 6 v. R. C. JOHNSON, Warden, Respondent.
9 This action was reassigned from a magistrate judge to the undersigned in light of a recent Ninth Circuit decision.1 Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed this pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkts. 1, 6. In addition, he has filed a motion to compel discovery, a motion for an evidentiary hearing, and a request for a status report. Dkts. 7, 10, 11.
14 Petitioner has filed a previous petition for a writ of habeas corpus with this Court, challenging the same conviction and sentence. See Case No. C 02-05541-MJJ (PR). The Court denied that petition on the merits. See Dkt. 19 in Case No. C 02-05541-MJJ (PR).
17 DISCUSSION 18 The Court finds the present petition is a second or successive petition attacking the same conviction and sentence as Petitioner’s prior federal habeas petition. A second or successive petition containing new claims may not be filed in the district court unless Petitioner first obtains from the United States Court of Appeals an order authorizing the district court to consider the petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Petitioner has not done so. Accordingly, this petition is DISMISSED without prejudice to filing a new habeas action if he obtains the necessary order.
24 CONCLUSION 25 For the foregoing reasons, the petition is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b).
1 Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 503 (9th Cir. 2017) (magistrate judge lacked jurisdiction 1 Based solely on Petitioner’s lack of financial resources, his application to proceed IFP is || GRANTED. Dkt. 6. The Clerk of the Court shall close the file and terminate all pending motions as moot, including his motion to compel discovery, motion for an evidentiary hearing, and request for a status report (dkts. 7, 10, 11).
5 This Order terminates Docket Nos. 6, 7, 10 and 11.
6 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 || Dated: June 26, 2020 2 ? 4 3b NNE GONZALEZ ROGERS 8 United States District Judge
© = 17 Z 18
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.