Brooke v. Woodside Hotel Group LTD
Trial Court Opinion
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 THERESA BROOKE, Case No. 20-cv-05821-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO 10 Vv. DISTRICT JUDGE 11 WOODSIDE HOTEL GROUP LTD, 2 Defendant.
14 Defendant Woodside Hotel Group Ltd. (“Woodside”) has moved to dismiss plaintiff 15 || Theresa Brooke’s complaint. Dkt. No. 7. None of the parties have consented to proceed before a a 16 || magistrate judge. Absent the consent of all parties, this Court does not have jurisdiction over this 17 matter and must refer the case to a district judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636; Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 18 (9th Cir. 2017); see also Civ. L.R. 73-1(a){2).
19 Accordingly, it is ordered that this case be reassigned to a district judge. All pending || motion hearings and scheduled appearances are hereby vacated and will be reset by the newly 21 assigned judge. Should all parties consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, this case may be || reassigned back to the undersigned magistrate judge.
23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 || Dated: September 21, 2020 7 VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI United States Magistrate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.