Heifetz v. Valledor Holdings, Inc.
Heifetz v. Valledor Holdings, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SHELBY GAIL HEIFETZ, Case No.20-cv-04182-NC
Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL 13 Re: Dkt. No. 12 14 VALLEDOR HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants. 15
16 5 17 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that
18 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 19 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 20 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 21 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 60 days. All scheduled dates are 22 || VACATED. 23 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 60 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 24 || Life Ins. Co. of Am.,
511 U.S. 375, 381(1994). 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 || Dated: November 12, 2020 LG-e<——— —> NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 28 United States Magistrate Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown