Heifetz v. Patel

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Heifetz v. Patel

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SHELBY GAIL HEIFETZ, Case No.20-cv-01519-NC

Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL 13 Re: Dkt. No. 22 KIRIT PATEL, et al., 14 Defendants. 15

16 5 17 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

18 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 19 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 20 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 21 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 60 days. All scheduled dates are 22 || VACATED. 23 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 60 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 24 || Life Ins. Co. of Am.,

511 U.S. 375, 381

(1994). 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 || Dated: November 12, 2020 h@e—— —> NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 28 United States Magistrate Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown